In Malaysia, government’s lax attitude to banning of books shows poor grasp of implications

alerts-button.jpgThe implication that book bannings in Malaysia can be reversed or reconsidered upon complaints from distributors or importers has distressed a local communication rights organisation.

“This implies, firstly, a lax attitude toward the banning of books and, second, it puts the onus for action on book distributors, whereas the responsibility should lie with the (Internal Security) Ministry to ensure that no frivolous bannings occur,” said the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) in a 9 January 2007 release.

Notwithstanding that, CIJ reiterated, “The banning of books is a serious violation of freedom of expression. It should not be done at all, and never done lightly.”

CIJ, a SEAPA partner in Malaysia, was responding to a 9 January report in “theSun” daily quoting Deputy Internal Security Minister Fu Ah Kiow as welcoming complaints from book distributors dissatisfied over arbitrary censorship of titles, an issue that came to light in recent months.

The deputy minister acknowledged the inconsistent interpretation of the censorship guideline at different entry points to the country and said the procedure will be streamlined.

While CIJ applauded the ministry’s move to engage in consultation and improve openness within, it found the underlying assumption that books must be banned disconcerting.

“It is also worrying that the ministry is looking at making the banning process more streamlined, rather than reconsidering whether book banning is important, effective or consistent with Malaysia’s aim of achieving Vision 2020 within the next decade and a half.”

(“Vision 2020” is Malaysia’s blueprint to make it a developed nation in 2020.)

“When books are banned, ideas are removed from circulation. This stunts the ability of our students, academics and general public from dealing with controversial ideas, and assumes a paternalistic attitude that is not suited to a country with a high standard of educational achievement,” said CIJ.

CIJ has consistently condemned the banning of books and with a group of over 100 individuals and 10 organisations had called for a repeal of the ban on 18 books in June 2006 (see its past alerts here: ).

SEAPA supports CIJ’s repeated calls for an end to the banning of books and a repeal of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: